What documentation should I receive from my lender prior to a foreclosure mediation?

Participation in Oregon’s new mediation program is required for lenders who initiated 175 or more foreclosure actions in the preceding calendar year. In our prior post (What documentation do I need to produce for a foreclosure mediation?), we itemized the documents that the homeowner must provide to the lender prior to a mediation. In this post, we address the documents that the lender must provide to the homeowner.

After a homeowner has paid the required fee ($175.00 but a fee reduction waiver is available for households making 200% or less of the federal poverty level) and submitted the required documents (see prior post), a lender is required to provide the homeowner with the following documents:

•      Copies of the residential trust deed and the promissory note that is evidence of the obligation that the trust deed secures;

•      The name and address of the person who owns the obligation secured by the trust deed;

•      A record of your payment history for the preceding 12 months or since you were last current on your loan obligation;

•      The amount you currently owe on the loan and the amount due to cure the default;

•      Input and output values for each Net Present Value model that your lender uses;

•      The most recent appraisal or price opinion your lender used to determine the value of your property;

•      The pooling or servicing agreement your lender entered into with another agency;

•      A description of any additional documents your lender needs to evaluate your eligibility for a foreclosure avoidance measure.

The documents the parties provide should provide both lender and borrower with a pretty good idea of whether or not a modification is likely under the circumstances. In some cases, it will be fairly clear that a modification is appropriate. In other cases, less so. In some cases, it will become fairly obvious that a modification is not likely (usually due to financial or affordability reasons). If this is the case, we would encourage homeowners to discuss possible exit strategies prior to mediation and to make sure that the lender will have someone present or available during the mediation that has actual authority to agree to an exit plan. If that person is not there, the parties may be required to come back for another resolution conference.

If you have any questions about the mediation process, whether you think you qualify for a mediation, or possible alternative exit strategies, please do not hesitate to contact Garland Griffiths Knaupp at (503) 846-0707.

We’re here to help.

What documentation do I need to produce for a foreclosure mediation?

In our last blog post (Foreclosure Actions Down—Way Down—As Oregon’s New Foreclosure Mediation Program Ramps Up—Way Up), we talked about the success that Oregon’s new mediation program is having in bringing borrowers and lenders to the mediation table. There are already more mediations scheduled in November and December of this year than total mediations that occurred under the old mediation program last year. As we discussed, mediation was only required under the old program if the lender filed a non-judicial foreclosure. This turned out to be a loophole the size of Mount Hood because lenders simply stopped filing non-judicial foreclosures and started filing judicial foreclosures instead. Now in fairness to the good people of the Oregon legislature, for the past 50 years or so, almost all foreclosure in Oregon were non-judicial foreclosures. The legislature certainly did not expect lenders to completely abandon the long-established practice of foreclosing non-judicially. But hindsight, as they say, is 20/20. Large lenders did just that—virtually stopped all non-judicial foreclosures—so the Oregon legislature had to step in once again to amend the law.

Enter the new foreclosure mediation program.

Mediation is now required in cases that involve judicial and non-judicial foreclosures.

Loophole closed. Mediation numbers skyrocket. And that is a good thing.

It is too early to tell whether these face-to-face meetings will actually result in more loan modifications. Despite ongoing pressure from the Federal government, and not one but two major settlements involving improper foreclosure servicing practices, loan modifications are still not easy to come by for some homeowners. And the promise of a mediation should not be confused with the promise of a loan modification. For a modification to occur, a borrower still must qualify and a great deal of supporting documentation is required. The process is not terribly enjoyable for homeowners. But if you want a modification, it is a process that you will have to go through.

So if you have a mediation scheduled, or you think you might qualify for a mediation, here are the documents that you will generally have to produce and provide to the lender. For homeowners who have already received a mediation notice, these documents must be provided within 25 days after receipt of the notice. So advance preparation is critical.

First, you will be required to complete a Universal Intake Form. This form is available on the foreclosure mediation website. This form details information about you, your lender, and your current financial situation.

You will also be required to provide the following:

Any additional information about your current income, expenses, debts, and other obligations;

• A description of your financial hardship, if any;

• Documents that verify your income and expenses, including:

• Pay stubs confirming your income for the most recent full two months

• If self-employed, a profit and loss statement

• Bank statements from the most recent two full months

• If relying on social security, disability, unemployment, or other non-wage benefits, a benefits statement from the benefit provider showing the amount, frequency, and duration of the benefit

• A divorce decree judgment or separation agreement if you are relying on child

• Your most recent electric, heat, gas, or other utility bill

• Your most recent property tax statement or appraisal

• Your tax returns from the two most recent years

Providing accurate and complete information will greatly improve your chances of reaching an agreement with your lender during a mediation. This is a valuable opportunity that should not be wasted. Yes, accumulating all these documents takes time and involves no small amount of effort. But this effort may be well worth it if a mediation results in an agreement which will save your home.

So don’t delay. Time is of the essence. Start preparing now.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at (503) 846-0707 or visit our foreclosure defense website garlandgriffiths.com.





Next: What documentation should I receive from my lender prior to a foreclosure mediation?

Foreclosure Actions Down—Way Down—As Oregon’s New Foreclosure Mediation Program Ramps Up—Way Up

There is good news on the often gloomy foreclosure defense front.

Oregon’s new foreclosure mediation program is only a few months old, but lenders (yes, lenders!) have referred over 1,700 new cases to the Mediation Case Manager, the agency responsible for running the program for the state. Of that, more than 1300 cases were just received in the last few weeks.

Chase Bank is the largest bank participating so far with more than 600 requests. The four banks with the most mediation requests are Chase, Nationstar, Green Tree Servicing and US Bank. Bank of America and Wells Fargo—the state’s largest mortgage lender—have yet to submit mediation requests. However, B of A and Well Fargo are (purportedly) preparing to submit a large volume of cases “soon.”

If true, that is really, really good news.

The new mediation program requires the state’s large mortgage lenders to offer a meeting with homeowners before they can foreclose. Lenders must submit mediation requests to the Mediation Case Manager and homeowners are then contacted by a Mediation Case Manager representative notifying them of the request. Homeowner’s must then pay a fee—$50 or $175 depending on household income—to participate in the program and work with a HUD-approved housing counselor. Housing counselors will work with homeowners throughout the process and help homeowners obtain and complete the required documents and upload these documents to the mediation program online portal. Housing counselors will also be available to review the lender's documents once they are available in the online system. In some cases, housing counselors may attend the mediation conference with homeowners and serve as an advocate and aid in the discussion on foreclosure avoidance options.

At present, there are currently 100+ mediations scheduled for November and December.

Unsurprisingly, the success of the new mediation program has had a direct impact on the number of new foreclosure actions throughout the state. New foreclosure cases have virtually ground to a halt while the first wave of mediations make their way through the program. According to numbers compiled by Gorilla Capital, a Eugene company that buys and resells distressed properties, foreclosures in the state’s largest seven counties have fallen by 42 percent from a year ago and 80 percent from a month earlier month. While this might be a temporary reprieve, the opportunity for a struggling homeowner to have a face-to-face meeting with a lender is meaningful and should not be ignored. Our hope is that a large percentage of these mediations will result in some sort of agreement—whether that agreement is for a loan modification, a short sale or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure.

Time will tell.

If you have any questions about the new mediation program, please visit the Oregon Foreclosure Avoidance Program website or call Garland, Griffiths Knaupp at (503) 846-0707. We’re here to help.

3 Things You Can Do To Help Yourself WIN a Foreclosure Defense Case

Thinking about hiring a lawyer to pursue a wrongful foreclosure or unfair trade practices lawsuit against your lender?

Well here's an important little tidbit. 

Despite what you might think, or what you might see on those clever legal dramas on prime time television, or what that high-priced lawyer in downtown Portland might tell you... 

Lawyers do not win cases.

That's right, we said it. 

We'll say it again.

Lawyers. Do. NOT. Win. Cases.

Facts win cases.

Strike that.

Facts supported by EVIDENCE win cases.

Ever played poker? It's just like that. After all the preening and puffing and posturing, at some point you have to put up or shut up. You have to show your cards.  Winning a case in a court of law is really no different. 

You claim, for example:

Judge....the bank TOLD me if I stopped paying my mortgage, I would get a loan modification. I just did what the bank told me to do! Then they screwed me and filed a foreclosure anyway!

That, good people, is a factual assertion. 

The judge then says:

I understand what you're saying, sir. I understand that you feel you've been wronged, sir.

You smile and think: Justice at last! That big evil bank is going down! 

But the judge doesn't stop there. The judge slowly leans over oh-so-slightly, lowers his or her reading glasses, looks you squarely in the eyes and says....

Now prove it.

Silence. 

The judge is looking at you.

Your lawyer looks at you. 

You look at your lawyer and think: You're the one with a law degree! Do something! Say something! 

Guess what?  There is no pixie dust we can waive over the court's eyes to make everything alright. There is no magic bullet. No eloquent, eleventh hour speech we can make that will seize the day. What we need, what every lawyer needs—and this is where you can help you help yourself—is evidence.

Evidence, good people, is the magic pixie dust that wins cases.

**********

Have you been mislead by a lender or loan servicer?

Do you believe your foreclosure is wrongful?

Were you mislead into believing you would get a loan modification?

If it makes you feel any better (and it probably won't), there are lots of people out there just like you. You have been wronged. You deserve your day in court. But the critical difference between winning and losing a lawsuit, should it come to that, is having what lawyers refer to as an evidentiary trail. So before you call an attorney, here are 3 things you can do to help yourself WIN that foreclosure defense case:

1.  Record your conversations.

Whenever we suggest recording your conversations with a lender, especially when you're talking about something meaningful or especially important, the almost immediate push back is: "Is that legal?" 

The answer is yes.

Federal law and Oregon law prohibit recording any telephone conversation where you are not a party. (In other words, you can't record someone else's conversation). However, it is perfectly legal here in Oregon to record a telephone conversation as long as one party consents to the recording (see ORS §§165.535, 165.540). What this means is that unless you object to recording yourself, then it is not illegal to record your conversation with another party and then use that conversation as evidence in a court of law. 

Some states, such as Washington, require that both parties consent to the recording of a telephone call. This means that before the conversation can be recorded, the party doing the recording must let the other party know the conversation will be recorded and that party must then consent to the recording. So if you live in Oregon but you're calling Washington, follow Washington law and notify the lender about the recording. If you're calling somewhere else (New York for example), find out if only one party or both parties must be notified. The safest choice, if you're unsure about what to do, is to notify the other party that you intend to record the conversation. 

2.  Get it in writing.

Lenders will tell you a great many things. We have heard horror story after horror story about customer service representatives or loss mitigation mangers telling clients something, but there is no record, anywhere, of what was said, when it was said, or who said it. So whenever possible, if you reach any sort of an agreement with a lender, ask the person on the line to confirm the agreement in an email. You don't need a full blown contract or anything fancy, just a simple email confirming whatever it is you talked about will do. Emails are particularly useful because they are date and time stamped and the sender is clearly identified.

3.  If you can't get it in writing , then confirm it in writing yourself.

In order to be admissible as evidence in court, your don't have to have something in writing from your lender. While this is generally better, many lenders are loathe to confirm anything they say in writing. Or your lender will tell you that they have no problem sending you an email or letter, but you never actually get anything.

So be proactive.

When you conclude a conversation, ask for the person's name, title, address and email address. Then immediately write an email (if the bank will accept an email; if not, write an actual letter) to the person you spoke to confirming the conversation. Something like this will suffice: "Dear Mr. Smith, I enjoyed speaking to you on the telephone today. This email simply confirms our discussion and the agreement we reached during our conversation to [fill in the blank]. The court doesn't require anything fancy. You don't have to write like a lawyer. Just confirm what you discussed and send it via regular mail or email to that person. The existence of an a writing confirming a conversation is evidence you can introduce in court about that conversation. Why? Because the law presumes that if you send someone a writing containing factual assertions, but those assertions are not true, then you will receive a writing of some sort in response denying those assertions. Confirming writing from you + no response from bank = good evidence in court.

And evidence good people, not just facts, is the magic pixie dust you need. 

So help you help yourself and remember these three simple things: (1) record your conversations, (2) get it in writing and/or (3) confirm it in writing. These simple steps could be the critical difference between winning and losing your foreclosure defense case.

And if you have any questions at all, please do not hesitate to contact us at (503) 846-0707 or visit our website at garlandgriffiths.com. 

"Enormous Increase" in Foreclosure Meditation Requests

The new Oregon Foreclosure Avoidance Program has received over 450 mediation requests since its inception on August 4, 2013. What is most compelling about this number is that the vast majority of mediation requests have come from lenders. In the first 13 months of the prior Oregon mediation program, only 286 cases were referred to mediation. However, the prior program was overhauled by Senate Bill 558, which came into law last spring. Under Senate Bill 558, both non-judicial and judicial foreclosures are now subject to the mediation requirement. Under the prior program, only non-judicial foreclosures required mediation. As a consequence, many lenders simply stopped using nonjudicial foreclosures and moved to judicial foreclosures instead. This unintended loophole virtually gutted the "mediation requirement" under the old mediation program. 

Under the new program, a lender who intends to foreclose (whether the vehicle is a judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure) must first request a meeting with the homeowner. A representative from the Oregon Foreclosure Administration Program--the agency responsible for administrating the mediation program--will notify the homeowner of the request. The homeowner has 25 days to respond and must pay a fee -- $50 or $200 depending on income -- and provide some financial information to the lender. The lender must provide payment history and a copy of the loan documents to the homeowner. 

According to Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum, indications are that hundreds of additional cases could be referred to the new program in the upcoming weeks.

“No one’s happy about impending foreclosures, but we’re delighted with these numbers because, unlike the earlier program, it means this one is working the way it’s supposed to,” said Rosenblum. “We worked hard to close the loophole that allowed banks to avoid face-to-face meetings with borrowers. We remain hopeful that getting lenders and borrowers together at the same table will help prevent foreclosures and keep Oregonians in their homes.”

The mediation requirement will not end the foreclosure problem. Almost 29,000 Oregonians still remain more than 90 days in arrears on their mortgages. Many embattled homeowners have moved and cannot be located. Others lack the resources to pay even a modified mortgage. However, the recent change to the mediation law will result in a significant upswing in the number of face-to-face meetings between homeowners and lenders and that is certainly a step in the right direction.

If a foreclosure action has been initiated against you after August 4, 2013 and you are uncertain about whether or not your lender has complied with the requirements of the new mediation program, we would encourage you to contact us immediately. Alternatively, visit the Oregon Foreclosure Avoidance Program website for more information about the new mediation program. 

Know Your Rights: No More "Dual Tracking"

What is "dual tracking?"

Dual tracking is an ugly, insidious (and therefore unsurprisingly commonplace) practice where Big Bank X (insert name here) is actively negotiating a loan modification with a homeowner while pursuing a foreclosure against that same homeowner...at the same time.  The glaring inequity to this practice has long been a topic of vociferous objection among foreclosure defense attorneys and consumer rights advocates. Thankfully, corrective legislative protections are on the horizon.

Created by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protect Act of 2010, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (or CFPB for short) will have broad--some say unparalleled--regulatory authority to create rules and enforce consumer protection laws that restrict unfair, deceptive or abusive acts and practices (commonly known as UDAAPs). One UDAAP that the CFPB is seeking to forever eliminate is the practice of dual tracking. Consequently, beginning in January of 2014, new CFPB rules will:

• Require a lender or servicer to establish "live contact" with a delinquent borrower within 5 weeks of delinquency and inform the borrower in writing about available loan modification and other loss mitigation options by the 45th day following delinquency.
• Prevent a lender or servicer from filing for foreclosure unless the borrower is more than 4 months delinquent.  
• Prevent a lender or servicer from beginning a foreclosure once a delinquent homeowner submits a loan modification until after a written denial is sent to the homeowner and a 14-day appeal period has run or an appeal has been denied.  The new rules also require the lender or loan servicer “exercise reasonable diligence in obtaining documents and information to complete a loss mitigation" and for the lender/servicer to give the specific reasons for a denial in the denial notice.
• Allow the homeowner to submit an application for a loan modification or other loss mitigation option at any time after the foreclosure process has commenced up to the 37th day before a scheduled foreclosure sale. Once the application is submitted, the servicer may not go through with a foreclosure sale until: (1) the servicer has notified the homeowner that he, she or they are not eligible for loss mitigation (and any appeal or appeal time has been exhausted); (2) the homeowner has rejected all proposals or offers of loss mitigation; or (3) the homeowner has violated or failed to comply with terms of a loss mitigation option such as making required payments under a trial modification plan.

In sum, these new CFPB rules are designed to ensure that lenders and servicers negotiate in good faith and in a timely manner before commencing a foreclosure action. Will these rules stop foreclosures? No. Will these rules have a positive impact on the number of foreclosures? One would hope so.

If nothing else, these new CFPB rules are certainly a step in the right direction.

For more information, please visit the CFPB website at consumerfinance.gov or visit our dedicated foreclosure defense website at garlandgriffiths.com.
 

Foreclosure 101: The good, the bad and the ugly—understanding foreclosures under the Oregon Trust Deed Act

When you borrow money to purchase a home in Oregon, the loan is usually memorialized in a written promissory note that contains your unconditional promise to pay a certain sum on a certain date by a certain time.  Borrower and lender also generally enter into a separately-memorialized security agreement at the same time the promissory note is executed. This “security agreement” does exactly what it sounds like—it secures your promise to repay the loan. Traditionally, the security agreement of choice in Oregon was a mortgage. If you defaulted on your mortgage, your lender could then exercise its right to sell your property to satisfy the obligation, but it could only do so by bringing a judicial action against you in court. This is what is known as a "judicial foreclosure" because judicial involvement is required in order to foreclose on a home.  However, as any lawyer worth his or her salt will tell you, lawsuits in any forum for any reason can be slow, expensive and uncertain. Lenders wanted a faster, easier, more streamlined process.


Enter the Oregon Trust Deed Act (commonly known as the OTDA).
 

The OTDA was enacted in 1959 to provide a nonjudicial alternative to the long-standing judicial foreclosure process. This nonjudicial alternative would be available if the parties first used a trust deed instead of a mortgage to secure their loan.  What is a trust deed? A trust deed works much like a mortgage, except that instead of two parties to the security agreement (the borrower/mortgagor and the lender/mortgagee), there are three parties: (1) the "grantor" of the trust (the borrower), (2) the "beneficiary" of the trust (the lender), and an independent "trustee" of the trust who has the power to sell the property without court approval in the event that the borrower defaults on the note. This process—when a trustee appointed under a trust deed sells a piece of property without court involvement after a borrower default—is known as a "nonjudicial foreclosure."
 

Nonjudicial foreclosures under the OTDA were much faster, much easier and much cheaper than traditional judicial foreclosures. The result? Lenders in Oregon stopped using mortgages as the security instrument of choice (real shock here) and started using trust deeds instead. So if you are a homeowner with a “mortgage,”, it is almost certainly the case that you do not actually have “a mortgage" (even though your lender and everybody else might refer to it as a mortgage), but have a trust deed securing your loan instead. (For more information, read our blog What Do You Mean I Don't Have a Mortgage?").

So here’s a brief recap in a nutshell.

OTDA created in 1959.

If lender uses trust deeds, lenders  have right to use the nonjudicial foreclosure process under the OTDA.

Nonjudicial foreclosure = trustee sale (a means of foreclosing on a piece of property without having to go to court.
 


But there are rules.

 

If a lender wants to use the faster, nonjudicial process available under the OTDA, there are explicit conditions that the lender must follow. Substantial compliance is not enough. These conditions must be followed to the letter. These conditions include:

• Recording the trust deed, and any assignments of the trust deed, in the county where the property is located (much more on this "recording" requirement later)
• An actual default on the obligation, "the performance of which is secured by the trust deed;"
• Recording a notice of default containing the trustee's or beneficiary's election to sell the property to satisfy the obligation; and
• The absence of any other pending or completed litigation for recovery of the debt (with limited exceptions).

 In addition to those conditions, the OTDA prescribes the notice requirements that protect trust deed grantors (you) from unauthorized nonjudicial foreclosures and sales of your property. Among other things, a trustee is required to provide you at least 120 days advance notice of the trustee's sale. This 120-day advance notice period is designed to give you time to seek judicial intervention if need be. You also have the right to “cure” your default at any time up to five (5) days before the date last set for the sale (more on “curing” a default below).

  


Here are a few more important facts.
 

One of the biggest differences between a judicial and nonjudicial foreclosure involves what is referred to as the "statutory right of redemption." In a judicial foreclosure action, the borrower has the right to redeem (i.e., buy back) the property for up to six months after the foreclosure for the amount that the property was sold for at the sheriff's sale. No such right exists if the property is sold at a nonjudicial trustee's sale. Seems kind of unfair on its face, right? That lenders can use a much faster nonjudicial foreclosure process AND the borrower has no statutory right of redemption?
 

Well...yes and no. In the law, there are always trade-offs. The trade off here is in how a borrower can “cure” a default in a judicial versus nonjudicial action.
 

In a judicial foreclosure, in order to cure a default and stop a foreclosure action, the borrower must, in most instances, pay the full amount of the loan plus costs. As you can well imagine, this is an almost impossible burden for most homeowners in default to meet. However, in a nonjudicial action, the borrower can cure the default by simply paying all amounts past due (meaning the arrearage), plus costs. This obligation is much more manageable. So while the timelines are much shorter with the nonjudicial foreclosure process, the burden for curing the default is much lower.
 

That is a good thing.

**********

In the aftermath of the OTDA, the foreclosure process here in Oregon looked much the same. Judicial foreclosures were extremely rare. A “foreclosure on my mortgage” really meant a nonjudicial trustee’s sale pursuant to the rights given to a trustee under a trust deed. These nonjudicial foreclosures went largely unchallenged for decades.

Then everything changed.

In 2012, the State of Oregon Court of Appeals dropped the legal equivalent of a megaton bomb on the nonjudicial foreclosure process in the case of Niday v. GMAC.  Niday exposed fundamental flaws in what had become standard operating procedure in the nonjudicial foreclosure process and the erroneous assumptions of large commercial loan servicers. As a result, lawyers for Oregon banks were forced to go back to the old practice of judicial foreclosures for most Oregon home loans.

So stay tuned. Coming up next....
 

Next post: To record or not to record—The fate of nonjudicial foreclosures after Niday.